On Sunday 19 February 2017 09:30 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 02/02/2017 15:56, Jagan Teki wrote:
From: Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com>
Add board_mmc_get_env_dev
Switch the mmc env based on the mmc devno, instead of separately
defining a config item in include/configs using board_mmc_get_env_dev
- devno 0: sd/esd
- devno 1: mmc/emmc
Cc: Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de>
Cc: Matteo Lisi <matteo.l...@engicam.com>
Cc: Michael Trimarchi <mich...@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com>
---
board/engicam/icorem6_rqs/icorem6_rqs.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/board/engicam/icorem6_rqs/icorem6_rqs.c
b/board/engicam/icorem6_rqs/icorem6_rqs.c
index f289e91..d2f9309 100644
--- a/board/engicam/icorem6_rqs/icorem6_rqs.c
+++ b/board/engicam/icorem6_rqs/icorem6_rqs.c
@@ -47,6 +47,12 @@ int board_init(void)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC
+int board_mmc_get_env_dev(int devno)
+{
+ /* dev 0 for SD/eSD, dev 1 for MMC/eMMC */
+ return (devno == 3) ? 1 : 0;
+}
+
static void mmc_late_init(void)
{
char cmd[32];
IMHO just patch 1 has an issue - could you resubmit just that patch ? I
will merge then the whole patchset.
look like there are few other patches have merge issue, will resolve and
send the two series again, will it be OK?
thanks!
--
Jagan Teki
Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com
U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer
Hyderabad, India.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
