Hi Andy, On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 18:09 +0800, Bin Meng wrote: >> Hi Andy, >> >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Andy Shevchenko >> <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 11:00 +0800, Bin Meng wrote: >> > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Andy Shevchenko >> > > <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >> > > What's the architecture of Intel Edison? Normally such platform >> > > Kconfig option should go to arch/x86/cpu/<platform>/Kconfig >> > >> > What do you mean? >> > x86_64. >> >> Sorry I should say what the platform is, like Ivybridge, Baytrail, >> Quark that U-Boot currently supports. > > It's misunderstanding here. > arch/x86/cpu/<SoC/CPU/platform>/ > So, all of above either SoC or platform. A little mess. >
Yes, it's either SoC (single chipset), or platform (CPU plus platform controller). > So, we will put the code to tangier folder because Intel Tangier is SoC. > Platform is Intel Merrifield. > >> If this is a new platform, > > Yes. > >> we >> should probably move it to arch/x86/cpu/<platform>/Kconfig. > > Probably not. Intel MID covers more than one SoC/platform. This option > is x86 scope. > OK, so can you please add a help text for the new config to describe what MID is and its features? I assume it has some difference that worth introducing such a sub-arch option. > I dunno that U-Boot will run on the rest MID devices, but for sake of > logic and consistency it is not about Edison or Merrifield or Tangier. Regards, Bin _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
