On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 02:46:22PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > On 02/08/2017 02:40 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 12:42:33PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > >> On 02/08/2017 07:07 AM, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wednesday 08 February 2017 06:26 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >>>> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 06:03:31PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> - Enable SPL_DM on all DRA7 and AM57xx based platforms. > >>>>> - SPL uses a generic dts on all platforms with same defconfig. > >>>>> - After this series SPL size is increased by ~7KB. > >>>> > >>>> That's not a bad size growth, esp here where we can afford it. Did you > >>> > >>> Yeah, but I am worried about this size on am335x. > >>> > >> > >> I am also, I'm working to save about 30 bytes right now to include > >> another boot mode into HS SPL, +7Kb will simply not work. It looks like > >> you also get some of your saving from enabling simple_malloc, this is > >> already enabled for AM335x-HS, so the size increase will likely be > >> greater on the platform that needs it the most :( > > > > I know I said it only the other day but switching from gcc-4.x/5.x to > > 6.x saves a bunch of space, even on am335x hs. I guess my request is > > that you pick up a gcc-6.x (Debian/unstable, Fedora 25 or I assume > > Linaro) compiler for ARM and see converting am335x HS to SPL_DT is > > anywhere close to fitting in the constraint. > > > > I'm already using Linaro's gcc-6.x, I don't believe SPL fits anymore > using the old compilers as it stands today.
You're enforcing the max size constraint today via the appropriate config option, right? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
