On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 06:58:10PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > > > On Wednesday 08 February 2017 06:45 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 06:37:17PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Wednesday 08 February 2017 06:26 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >>> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 06:03:31PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > >>> > >>>> - Enable SPL_DM on all DRA7 and AM57xx based platforms. > >>>> - SPL uses a generic dts on all platforms with same defconfig. > >>>> - After this series SPL size is increased by ~7KB. > >>> > >>> That's not a bad size growth, esp here where we can afford it. Did you > >> > >> Yeah, but I am worried about this size on am335x. > > > > Agreed, at least wrt HS platforms as well. > > > >> > >>> experiment with going the board-data way? Also it looks like we're > >> > >> hmm.. IIUC, board-data is duplication of same data that is available in > >> DT. Anyways all the unsed nodes in DT are removed for SPL case. So, I > >> used this approach. > > > > My understanding was that going this way (ala rockchip) does save space. > > We may also need to start saying that gcc-6 is required on these > > platforms in order to take advantage of having all of the unused strings > > really be discarded from the final binary. > > Okay, Ill try this for am335x. I guess the current approach is fine for > DRA7 and AM57?
Yes, this is fine for DRA7/AM57. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
