> Dear Tom, > > In message <4adb78d4.2060...@windriver.com> you wrote: > > > > > And where is this patch coming from? Again, I canot see a trace of it > > > in the mailing list archive, and anyway, it must go through the net > > > custodian, or at least have Ben's blessing (Acked-by: line). > > > > > This came from the last ti pull. > > Ah, I see. > > Sandeep, please never check in commits that have not bee posted on > the mailing list. And please don't check in commits that need to go > through another repository (or at least make sure you have the > Acked-by: from the respective custodian). Thanks.
Wolfgang, There were some issues with "Overo Tobi ethernet support". There was a follow up patch that was actually inline in an e-mail rather than formally being a patch. Thus I had to give it my own subject header. Look at this http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/062150.html For the entire thread please refer to. It had Ben's blessing http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/062197.html This post also gives some more background http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/062301.html basically as you can see even I got confused as there was no formal patch. The patch was kind of inline and once Ben was OK as can be seen above, I applied it. I gave it my own header because I had to give something. I hope this clears and lingering issues > > > > > > I will fix the subject in at91 patch > > and remove the overo net patch > > and restore the author of the 3430 sdp patch with a rebase. > > > > I will resend the pull request when done. > Thanks, Sandeep _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
