On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Phil Edworthy <phil.edwor...@renesas.com> wrote: > Hi Jagan, > > On 02 December 2016 14:20, Jagan Teki wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Phil Edworthy >> <phil.edwor...@renesas.com> wrote: >> > This is in preparation for adding another arg. >> >> ?? proper reason for changing arg to bool. > Purely because the patch 11 adds another arg that is a bool (which is the > natural > type as it is read from a dtb). Then having this bypass arg as something other > than a bool look a bit odd.
Can't we make this as 11 and saying the reason for bool which is used/compatible with previous dt patch (I mean 11th patch in the current case)? thanks! -- Jagan Teki Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer Hyderabad, India. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
