Hi Stefan,
On 15 November 2016 at 14:02, Stefan Agner <ste...@agner.ch> wrote:
> From: Stefan Agner <stefan.ag...@toradex.com>
>
> Some devices (e.g. dra7xx) support loading to RAM using DFU without
> having direct boot from RAM support. Make sure the linker list
> does not contain BOOT_DEVICE_RAM if CONFIG_SPL_RAM_SUPPORT is not
> enabled.
>
> Fixes: 98136b2f26fa ("spl: Convert spl_ram_load_image() to use linker list")
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan.ag...@toradex.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2:
> - Use CONFIG_SPL_RAM_SUPPORT to descide whether to compile the
> function in first place.
>
> common/spl/spl.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/spl/spl.c b/common/spl/spl.c
> index bdb165a..ef17619 100644
> --- a/common/spl/spl.c
> +++ b/common/spl/spl.c
> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ __weak void __noreturn jump_to_image_no_args(struct
> spl_image_info *spl_image)
> # define CONFIG_SPL_LOAD_FIT_ADDRESS 0
> #endif
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_RAM_DEVICE) || defined(CONFIG_SPL_DFU_SUPPORT)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_RAM_SUPPORT) || defined(CONFIG_SPL_DFU_SUPPORT)
> static ulong spl_ram_load_read(struct spl_load_info *load, ulong sector,
> ulong count, void *buf)
Can this be moved into its own file?
> {
> @@ -220,7 +220,9 @@ static int spl_ram_load_image(struct spl_image_info
> *spl_image,
>
> return 0;
> }
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_RAM_SUPPORT)
> SPL_LOAD_IMAGE_METHOD(0, BOOT_DEVICE_RAM, spl_ram_load_image);
> +#endif
> #if defined(CONFIG_SPL_DFU_SUPPORT)
> SPL_LOAD_IMAGE_METHOD(0, BOOT_DEVICE_DFU, spl_ram_load_image);
> #endif
> --
> 2.10.2
>
Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
