On 16.11.2016 07:34, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16.11.2016 01:50, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> It seems pretty odd that the minimum supported SDHCI frequency is
>> the maximum frequency shifted _left_ by 9 bits.
>> Shifting it right by that amount seems to make much more sense.
>>
>> Pointed out by GCC 6.2 as the value needs more than 32 bits.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com>
>> ---
>> include/configs/xilinx_zynqmp_ep.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/configs/xilinx_zynqmp_ep.h
>> b/include/configs/xilinx_zynqmp_ep.h
>> index 8e4b960..d0ce768 100644
>> --- a/include/configs/xilinx_zynqmp_ep.h
>> +++ b/include/configs/xilinx_zynqmp_ep.h
>> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
>> #define __CONFIG_ZYNQMP_EP_H
>>
>> #define CONFIG_ZYNQ_SDHCI_MAX_FREQ 52000000
>> -#define CONFIG_ZYNQ_SDHCI_MIN_FREQ (CONFIG_ZYNQ_SDHCI_MAX_FREQ << 9)
>> +#define CONFIG_ZYNQ_SDHCI_MIN_FREQ (CONFIG_ZYNQ_SDHCI_MAX_FREQ >> 9)
>> #define CONFIG_ZYNQ_EEPROM
>> #define CONFIG_SATA_CEVA
>> #define CONFIG_ZYNQMP_XHCI_LIST {ZYNQMP_USB0_XHCI_BASEADDR, \
>>
>
> thanks for the patch. We have fixed that in our internal repo but didn't
> send this out yet.
>
> Here is the link
> https://github.com/Xilinx/u-boot-xlnx/commit/299ceaf77ee6d5a555ecb5f129bd9248aa981837
>
> Definitely it is good patch and will apply.
ok - it is already the part of my pull request I sent yesterday
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-November/272771.html
Thanks,
Michal
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
