On 19 October 2016 at 01:36, Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:23:54AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Maxime, >> >> On 18 October 2016 at 01:26, Maxime Ripard >> <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> wrote: >> > Hi Simon, >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:17:33PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> On 17 October 2016 at 14:50, Maxime Ripard >> >> <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> wrote: >> >> > Now that the overlay code has been merge upstream, update our copy to >> >> > what's been merged, since a significant number of issues have been fixed >> >> > during the merge process. >> >> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> >> >> > --- >> >> > include/libfdt.h | 24 ++++-- >> >> > lib/libfdt/fdt_overlay.c | 199 >> >> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- >> >> > lib/libfdt/fdt_strerror.c | 3 + >> >> > 3 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> >> > >> > Sorry for the dumb question, but shouldn't that go through your tree ? >> >> Yes. Since we are at RC2 I was thinking of waiting until next cycle >> though. Or do you think this is urgent? > > I'd be enclined to say yes. It really contains a significant number of > fixes for some cases that might definitely be used in real life, so > it totally counts as a fix for me. > > And since the changes are well contained, and it passes the tests both > in dtc and in U-Boot, I'd say that it's pretty safe to merge.
Applied to u-boot-fdt, thanks! _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
