Dear Kumar Gala,

In message <19e9b551-f442-4ba2-98a3-c941620e4...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
> 
> Dope, posted the wrong version.  I agree w/the long lines, not sure  
> what to do about it.  Move to something like:
> 
> typedef struct ccsr_local {
>       /* 0x0 - Control Configuration Status Registers Base Address Register  
> High */
>       u32     ccsrbarh;       
>       /* 0x4 - Control Configuration Status Registers Base Address Register  
> Low */
>       u32     ccsrbarl;       
> 
> ...
> 
> even this exceeds the 80 column limit.

Why do you need to carry the offset in the comment?

What about:

Control Config Status Regs Base Addr Reg ?

or

BAR = Base Address Register (once initially)

Control Config Status Regs BAR ?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
Time is an illusion perpetrated by the manufacturers of space.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to