Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Sep 18, 2009, at 6:08 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > >> There are a couple defines and PCI bridge quirks related to the PCI >> backplane of the MPC8548CDS that have no meaning in the context of >> the port to the sbc8548 board, so delete them. >> >> Also, the form factor of the sbc8548 is a standalone board with a >> single PCI-X and a single PCI-e slot. That pretty much guarantees >> that it will never be a PCI agent itself, so the host/agent and root >> complex/end node distinctions have been removed. >> >> Similarly, since there is no physical connector mapping to PCI2, so >> all references of PCI2 in the board support files have been removed >> as well. >> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com> >> --- >> board/sbc8548/sbc8548.c | 63 >> ++++---------------------------------------- >> include/configs/sbc8548.h | 9 ------ >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) > > Can we look at using fsl_pci_init_port()?
Sure. > > See my recent patches for p2020/mpc8572ds/mpc8536ds What did you have in mind - me creating a similar patch like the above to layer on what I've got now, or is there a preference for me to munge the same change into the existing 5/8 PCI update patch? I guess the former gives an extra bisection point... P. > > - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
