On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 07:43:24PM -0700, Stefan Agner wrote: > On 2016-08-03 16:18, Joe Hershberger wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Stefan Agner <ste...@agner.ch> wrote: > >> From: Stefan Agner <stefan.ag...@toradex.com> > >> > >> Flush loaded data cacheline aligned. This avoids warnings such as > >> CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [81000000, 816d0fa8] > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan.ag...@toradex.com> > >> --- > > > > This was already rejected once. > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-April/121564.html > > Oh I see, and in the end the message was converted to a debug() call, in > essence turning the whole problem back under a stone... :-) > > FWIW, I largely support Mike Frysinger's position in that discussion, > and think it should be fine to flush these extra bytes...
I re-read most of that thread last-night and yes, it seems like rather than solving the problem we just put it into a debug(). But if I followed Mike's point right, we shouldn't be having a debug there either, the flushes are fine? And as to Marek's point there about driver bugs, it's perhaps only sub-optimal rather than a broken thing? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
