On 04/20/2016 06:12 PM, York Sun wrote: > +Roy to comment on iNIC. > > On 04/20/2016 06:05 PM, Qiang Zhao wrote: >> On 04/21/2016 12:58 AM, York Sun wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: York Sun [mailto:york....@nxp.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 12:58 AM >>> To: Qiang Zhao <qiang.z...@nxp.com> >>> Cc: Xiaobo Xie <xiaobo....@nxp.com>; u-boot@lists.denx.de >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "T2080QDS/PCIe: Soft Reset PCIe on T2080QDS for >>> down-training issue" >>> >>> On 04/11/2016 02:02 AM, Zhao Qiang wrote: >>>> This reverts commit 5066e62847bddf6030262ade2aa3e7bcdc930037. >>>> >>>> The reverted patch will block t2080RDB iNiC, it was a workaround for >>>> T2080QDS down-training issue, we need to revert it and find the root >>>> cause for T2080QDS down-training issue. >>> >>> You have a bad wrap-back in commit message. >>> >>> Does the workaround block anything? Can you revert it after figuring out the >>> root cause? >>> >> >> Yes, it blocks t2080RDB and c29x when using them as iNIC. >> If revert it after figuring out the root cause, how about iNIC? >> And I am afraid of it is a hard way to find the root cause. >> > > Qiang, > > You delete the code gated by CONFIG_FSL_PCIE_RESET, and the macro for > T208xQDS. > How does that affect T2080RDB or C29x? >
Qiang, Do you have an update? If not, I will defer this patch. York _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
