On 07/04/2016 07:26 PM, Hongbo Zhang wrote: > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 04-07-16 09:20, Hongbo Zhang wrote: >>> >>> I said I would send a new iteration of this series, but there are code >>> dependencies/conflicts with Chenyu's work, so I'd like to wait for a >>> few more days to see his v2 sent out or even been merged. >>> During this stage, any review comments are still appreciated, I am >>> always looking at this. >> >> >> In that case you can probably best base your work on the u-boot-sunxi next >> branch, that currently still has v1 of Chen-Yu's patches, but I do not think >> things will change that much: >> >> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-sunxi.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next >> > OK, I see > >> Regards, >> >> Hans >> >> >> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Hongbo Zhang <macro.wav...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:26 PM, york sun <york....@nxp.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 06/15/2016 12:16 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:01 PM, <macro.wav...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zh...@nxp.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> v5 changes: >>>>>>> - Give up fixing the potential bug of PSCI stack overlap with secure >>>>>>> text end >>>>>>> when there is more CPUs in system. Because I just want to keep this >>>>>>> series as >>>>>>> simple as it could be: adding basic PSCI v1.0 support and adding more >>>>>>> PSCI >>>>>>> v1.0 implements of our platform. >>>>>>> While too compplicated patches in assembly language won't call for >>>>>>> effective >>>>>>> reviews, even I think there is potential bug of PSCI stack, let's fix >>>>>>> it in >>>>>>> sepetated patch later. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I've done some patches fixing the stack allocation issue: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/wens/u-boot-sunxi/commits/c-psci-part2 >>>>>> >>>>>> These patches are ready, but I want to add a secure data section still. >>>>>> The data section will be for variables such as target PC, core/cluster >>>>>> power status, context ID, etc.. IMHO this is better than putting stuff >>>>>> at the top or bottom of the stack, and can also be referenced directly. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Chenyu, >>>>> >>>>> I see you have been working on PSCI for ARMv7. Can you review Hongbo's >>>>> patch set and give your comment or ack? >>>>> >>>>> York >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Thank Chenyu for valuable review comments, thank you York. >>>> Will send another version soon. >
Hongbo, Where are we on this thread? Do you have an update? York _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
