On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:10:26AM +0200, Guillaume GARDET wrote: > This patch enables NFSv3 support. > If NFSv2 is available use it as usual. > If NFSv2 is not available, but NFSv3 is available, use NFSv3. > If NFSv2 and NFSv3 are not available, print an error message since NFSv4 is > not supported. > > Tested on iMX6 sabrelite with 4 Linux NFS servers: > * NFSv2 + NFSv3 + NFSv4 server: use NFSv2 protocol > * NFSv2 + NFSv3 server: use NFSv3 protocol > * NFSv3 + NFSv4 server: use NFSv3 protocol > * NFSv3 server: use NFSv3 protocol
So, why do we have v2+v3+v4 -> v2 and not v2+v3+v4 -> v3, when we do v2+v3 -> v3 and v3+v4 -> v3 ? We should be consistent in preferring either v2 over v3 or v3 over v2. Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
