On 06/11/2016 10:58 PM, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: > Hi York, > > Thanks for your comments! > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: York Sun [mailto:york....@nxp.com] >> Sent: 2016年6月8日 8:56 >> To: Zhiqiang Hou <zhiqiang....@nxp.com>; u-boot@lists.denx.de; >> albert.u.b...@aribaud.net; scottw...@freescale.com; >> mingkai...@freescale.com; york...@freescale.com; le...@freescale.com; >> prabha...@freescale.com; bhupesh.sha...@freescale.com >> Subject: Re: [PATCHV5 4/6] ARMv8/Layerscape: switch SMP method accordingly >> >> On 06/04/2016 11:40 PM, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: >>> From: Hou Zhiqiang <zhiqiang....@nxp.com> >>> >>> If the PSCI and PPA is ready, skip the fixup for spin-table and waking >>> secondary cores. If not, change SMP method to spin-table, and the >>> device node of PSCI will be removed. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <zhiqiang....@nxp.com> >>> --- >>> V5: >>> - Changed the checking if the PSCI feature is ready to read the psci >>> version. >>> >>> V4: >>> - Reordered this patch. >>> >>> arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c | 17 +++++++++++++--- >>> arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c | 36 >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c >>> b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c >>> index 672a453..eb566cd 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c >>> @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ >>> #ifdef CONFIG_FSL_ESDHC >>> #include <fsl_esdhc.h> >>> #endif >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARMV8_SEC_FIRMWARE_SUPPORT #include >>> +<asm/armv8/sec_firmware.h> #endif >>> >>> DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; >>> >>> @@ -618,6 +621,7 @@ int arch_early_init_r(void) { #ifdef CONFIG_MP >>> int rv = 1; >>> + bool psci_support = false; >>> #endif >>> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A009635 @@ -625,9 +629,16 @@ int >>> arch_early_init_r(void) #endif >>> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_MP >>> - rv = fsl_layerscape_wake_seconday_cores(); >>> - if (rv) >>> - printf("Did not wake secondary cores\n"); >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARMV8_SEC_FIRMWARE_SUPPORT) && >> defined(CONFIG_ARMV8_PSCI) >>> + /* Check the psci version to determine if the psci is supported */ >>> + psci_support = (int)sec_firmware_support_psci_version() > 0 ? >>> + true : false; >> >> Another comment, even if the function can be used to indicate if psci is >> available, >> do you have to cast it to (int)? I think this can be simplified as >> psci_support = sec_firmware_support_psci_version() > 0; > > The type of this func return value is 'unsigned int', so the cast is > necessary.
If it can return negative values then change the function's return value. If the value is not really negative but you just want to test the upper bit, then do that explicitly. In any case, please explain what the format of this return value is supposed to be. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
