On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 04:16:26PM -0300, Carlos Santos wrote: > Due to some mistakes in the source code, it was not possible to really > turn FIT support off. This commit fixes the problem by means of the > following changes: > > - Enclose "bootm_host_load_image" and "bootm_host_load_images" between > checks for CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE, in common/bootm.c. > > - Enclose the declaration of "bootm_host_load_images" between checks for > CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE, in common/bootm.h. > > - Condition the compilation and linking of fit_common.o fit_image.o > image-host.o common/image-fit.o to CONFIG_FIT=y, in tools/Makefile. > > Signed-off-by: Carlos Santos <casan...@datacom.ind.br> > --- > Changes v1 -> v2 > Rebased to the top of master branch. > > common/bootm.c | 2 ++ > include/bootm.h | 2 ++ > tools/Makefile | 6 ++---- > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
So, why? I don't like the idea of making FIT support in mkimage conditional. This makes the life of distribution people harder, not easier. The functions in common/bootm.c should be being discarded in U-Boot itself when we don't have CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE. Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
