On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 01:59:13 -0700 Prafulla Wadaskar <prafu...@marvell.com> wrote: > > Well, I sent a patch "[PATCH, RFC] Make arm926ejs use -march=armv5t to > > avoid problems with EABI", which corrects this for me, although I'd > > like some input on if it really makes any sense. > > I have tested this with Sheevaplug, this patch even works well for me too. > The Kirkwood specification says that the core is armv5te compliant > But this change is global, applicable for all arm926ejs based SoC which isn't > relevant too. > Do anybody have similar test results with other processors? > > Since this is very specific NAND > How about looking into NAND code?
I did look at it, and indeed some of the ldrd/strd's are in the NAND code. I can't really see anything obviously wrong with the generated code. However, it's not NAND-specific. Depending on GCC version, I get issues with vsprintf or complete lockups as well. // Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
