Hi, On 21 April 2016 at 07:25, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > On 04/21/2016 03:17 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote: >> Hello Marek, >> >> Am 21.04.2016 um 14:51 schrieb Marek Vasut: >>> On 04/21/2016 02:48 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote: >>>> suppress a lot of >>>> "reg or ranges property, but no unit name" warnings, >>>> through the dtc compiler flag "-Wno-unit_address_vs_reg". >>>> >>>> If all DTS are fixed, we can remove this flag again. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> >>>> --- >>>> There is also a solution to suppress warnings from >>>> the dtc compiler by the "-q" flag, but that would >>>> suppress all warnings. Not realy what I want. >>> >>> Yep >>> >>>> With this patch and patch: >>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/609150/ >>>> >>>> travis build passes, see: >>>> https://travis-ci.org/hsdenx/u-boot/builds/124723016 >>>> >>>> >>>> arch/arc/dts/Makefile | 2 ++ >>>> arch/arm/dts/Makefile | 3 ++- >>>> arch/microblaze/dts/Makefile | 2 ++ >>>> arch/mips/dts/Makefile | 3 ++- >>>> arch/nios2/dts/Makefile | 2 ++ >>>> arch/powerpc/dts/Makefile | 2 ++ >>>> arch/sandbox/dts/Makefile | 2 ++ >>>> arch/x86/dts/Makefile | 2 ++ >>>> 8 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> Isn't there some common place in scripts/ or so where we can disable >>> this warning using an one-liner ? >> >> I don;t know ... but I prefer to disable this per arch .. so we can >> enable the check back if one arch is fixed ... > > In my opinion, we should stick to the same behavior Linux does. > Ccing a few more people.
Wouldn't it be better to fix the problems? Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
