Am 03.04.2016 um 05:56 schrieb Stephen Warren: > Now that rpi_*defconfig and Kconfig rather than the config header file,
"rpi*_defconfig"? Also the sentence seems to be missing a verb - "Now that we use ..."? > provide the identify of the build, we don't need to separate config "identity"? > headers and board directories for each RPi variant. Set CONFIG_SYS_BOARD > and CONFIG_SYS_CONFIG_NAME so that we can get rid of the duplication. This > requires a tiny number of extra ifdefs in the config header. > > The only disadvantage of this approach is that the $board/$board_name > environment variables aren't as descriptive as they used to be. This isn't > really an issue because those only exist to allow scripts to create DTB > filenames at runtime. However, the RPi board code already sets $fdtfile to > something more accurate based on FW-reported board ID anyway. > > While at it, unify some Kconfig select options, and add a MAINTAINERS > entry for bcm283x too. > > Partially-suggested-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> Regards, Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
