please, can this be accepted?
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Steve Rae <s...@broadcom.com> wrote:
> remove logging of the 'skipped' blocks
>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Rae <s...@broadcom.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2: None
>
> common/image-sparse.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/image-sparse.c b/common/image-sparse.c
> index ef0d232..737e8ea 100644
> --- a/common/image-sparse.c
> +++ b/common/image-sparse.c
> @@ -275,7 +275,6 @@ int store_sparse_image(sparse_storage_t *storage, void
> *storage_priv,
> sparse_buffer_t *buffer;
> uint32_t start;
> uint32_t total_blocks = 0;
> - uint32_t skipped = 0;
> int i;
>
> debug("=== Storage ===\n");
> @@ -336,7 +335,6 @@ int store_sparse_image(sparse_storage_t *storage, void
> *storage_priv,
> #ifdef CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH_MMC_DEV
> total_blocks += blkcnt;
> #endif
> - skipped += blkcnt;
> continue;
> }
>
> @@ -377,8 +375,8 @@ int store_sparse_image(sparse_storage_t *storage, void
> *storage_priv,
> sparse_put_data_buffer(buffer);
> }
>
> - debug("Wrote %d blocks, skipped %d, expected to write %d blocks\n",
> - total_blocks, skipped,
> + debug("Wrote %d blocks, expected to write %d blocks\n",
> + total_blocks,
> sparse_block_size_to_storage(sparse_header->total_blks,
> storage, sparse_header));
> printf("........ wrote %d blocks to '%s'\n", total_blocks,
> --
> 1.8.5
>
>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
