please, can this be accepted? On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Steve Rae <s...@broadcom.com> wrote:
> remove logging of the 'skipped' blocks > > Signed-off-by: Steve Rae <s...@broadcom.com> > --- > > Changes in v2: None > > common/image-sparse.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/common/image-sparse.c b/common/image-sparse.c > index ef0d232..737e8ea 100644 > --- a/common/image-sparse.c > +++ b/common/image-sparse.c > @@ -275,7 +275,6 @@ int store_sparse_image(sparse_storage_t *storage, void > *storage_priv, > sparse_buffer_t *buffer; > uint32_t start; > uint32_t total_blocks = 0; > - uint32_t skipped = 0; > int i; > > debug("=== Storage ===\n"); > @@ -336,7 +335,6 @@ int store_sparse_image(sparse_storage_t *storage, void > *storage_priv, > #ifdef CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH_MMC_DEV > total_blocks += blkcnt; > #endif > - skipped += blkcnt; > continue; > } > > @@ -377,8 +375,8 @@ int store_sparse_image(sparse_storage_t *storage, void > *storage_priv, > sparse_put_data_buffer(buffer); > } > > - debug("Wrote %d blocks, skipped %d, expected to write %d blocks\n", > - total_blocks, skipped, > + debug("Wrote %d blocks, expected to write %d blocks\n", > + total_blocks, > sparse_block_size_to_storage(sparse_header->total_blks, > storage, sparse_header)); > printf("........ wrote %d blocks to '%s'\n", total_blocks, > -- > 1.8.5 > > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot