On 01/05/2016 10:40 AM, Bryan Hundven wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 09:01:17AM -0800, York Sun wrote: >> >> >> On 12/23/2015 07:40 AM, Bryan Hundven wrote: >>> York, >>> >>> Just checking if you had seen this patch? >>> >> >> Yes, I noticed. You rename P2020RDB to P2020RDB_PC. Do you have another patch >> using P2020RDB? > > It may be irrelevant. I have a p1020rdb-pb. So technically, unless we > want to support p2020rdb-pb (which I don't have, and cannot test), you can > ignore this one. > > I have work here: https://github.com/bhundven/u-boot/tree/p1_p2_rdb-wip > where I have reverted removing the p1_p2_rdb board, but have started to > clean up the difference between p1_p2_rdb and p1_p2_rdb_pc. Eventually, > it makes sense to me to move p1_p2_rdb_pc to p1_p2_rdb, as it has pc, > and pd. If I can get time to finish, it would have p1020rdb-pb. Then just > add the small difference for p1011rdb/p1020rdb-pb. > What are your opinions on that?
I like clean and small changes. > > The things that are difficult right now are: > * ddr(2) does not use spd on pb? If I remember correctly, these boards have fixed DDR. RAW timing method was introduced to p1_p2_rdb_pc. You are welcome to use this method. It should be easy to back port. > * I have the ltib cds that came with the board, but I still feel like > I'm missing a reference manual that is for the pb version. I can find > the pc and pd versions of the 1020RM online. pb just seems a little > different. These boards are actually made by third parties. I have P1010RDB on my hand. If you need P1020RDB, I can find it for you. York _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
