On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com> wrote: > Hi Joe, > > On 15.12.2015 20:51, Joe Hershberger wrote: >> Hi Michal, >> >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Joe Hershberger >> <joe.hershber...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com> >>> wrote: >>>> recv function should return 0 instead of frame_len not to >>>> proceed the same packet again in core. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com> >>> >>> Acked-by: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@ni.com> >> >> Oops. NAK. Didn't realize this was the top-level recv function being >> passed to the eth layer. > > I expect that origin ACK was valid and you realized like for other > driver that here should be return 0 because separation with free_pkt is > done in 3/5.
Yes! Acked-by: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@ni.com> _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
