On 11 December 2015 at 20:58, Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
>> On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 03:59:14 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>> On 11 December 2015 at 02:57, Troy Kisky <troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com>
>> wrote:
>>> > If GENMASK is REALLY desired, it should be GENMASK(23,0)
>>> > But since GENMASK is obviously more confusing, let's just revert.
>>> >
>>> > This reverts commit bad490a24212c068c5b718b9189f47ea4075d078.
>>>
>>> Sorry, just fix genmask why revert? because driver author has no
>>> complaint on this, please don't just say simply "more confusing" more
>>> over I usually prefer reverting bug fix patches.
>>
>> I also agree this GENMASK() crap is confusing.
>
> Agreed. A simple proof that this is confusing is that it broke the
> fsl_qspi.c driver.

Probably your pointed at wrong h on genmask - but this wasn't be a
proof of any global defined macro it's a mistake of using improper h
value. If something went wrong with the patch then always ask and fix
for proper thing and blaming global macro which used in other files is
not a good thing.

thanks!
-- 
Jagan.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to