On Sunday 06 December 2015 08:13 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On 6 December 2015 at 11:33, Mugunthan V N <mugunthan...@ti.com> wrote:
>> On Thursday 03 December 2015 09:37 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>> On 19 November 2015 at 12:35, Mugunthan V N <mugunthan...@ti.com> wrote:
>>>> spi bus can support dual and quad wire data transfers for tx and
>>>> rx. So defining dual and quad modes for both tx and rx. Also add
>>>> support to parse bus width used for spi tx and rx transfers.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthan...@ti.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> include/spi.h | 4 ++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c b/drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c
>>>> index 58388ef..62d8da7 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c
>>>> @@ -349,6 +349,7 @@ int spi_slave_ofdata_to_platdata(const void *blob, int
>>>> node,
>>>> struct dm_spi_slave_platdata *plat)
>>>> {
>>>> int mode = 0;
>>>> + int value;
>>>>
>>>> plat->cs = fdtdec_get_int(blob, node, "reg", -1);
>>>> plat->max_hz = fdtdec_get_int(blob, node, "spi-max-frequency", 0);
>>>> @@ -360,6 +361,38 @@ int spi_slave_ofdata_to_platdata(const void *blob,
>>>> int node,
>>>> mode |= SPI_CS_HIGH;
>>>> if (fdtdec_get_bool(blob, node, "spi-half-duplex"))
>>>> mode |= SPI_PREAMBLE;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Device DUAL/QUAD mode */
>>>> + value = fdtdec_get_uint(blob, node, "spi-tx-bus-width", 1);
>>>> + switch (value) {
>>>> + case 1:
>>>> + break;
>>>> + case 2:
>>>> + mode |= SPI_TX_DUAL;
>>>> + break;
>>>> + case 4:
>>>> + mode |= SPI_TX_QUAD;
>>>> + break;
>>>> + default:
>>>> + error("spi-tx-bus-width %d not supported\n", value);
>>>> + break;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + value = fdtdec_get_uint(blob, node, "spi-rx-bus-width", 1);
>>>> + switch (value) {
>>>> + case 1:
>>>> + break;
>>>> + case 2:
>>>> + mode |= SPI_RX_DUAL;
>>>> + break;
>>>> + case 4:
>>>> + mode |= SPI_RX_QUAD;
>>>> + break;
>>>> + default:
>>>> + error("spi-rx-bus-width %d not supported\n", value);
>>>> + break;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>
>>> I think these are similar to SPI TX/RX operation modes in spi.h and I
>>> understand this is similar approach as with Linux but before this we
>>> need to do many changes on u-boot as well.
>>
>> I agree that op_mode_rx/op_mode_tx can be used. I just tried to follow
>> Linux way of implementation to have consistency between Linux and
>
> Agreed but the way these mode or flags handling in Linux vs u-boot is
> different.
>
>> U-Boot. If you feel that using op_mode_(rx/tx) will be the best
>> approach, I can repost the series with the changes.
>
> If this is a dependent patch wrt series pls- do otherwise bypass this
> with your series now once we handle these mode/flags with Linux way
> will add till now will mark it as "Under review" on patchwork.
>
08/16 patch is dependent on this patch where the mode is used to select
dual/quad mode. I will respin 05 (this patch) and 08 patch as a
follow-up patch.
Regards
Mugunthan V N
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
