On Aug 4, 2009, at 1:07 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kumar Gala, > > In message <1249352037-25832-1-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org > > you wrote: >> Every platform that calls fsl_pci_init calls pci_setup_indirect >> before >> it calls fsl_pci_init. There isn't any reason to just call it from >> fsl_pci_init and simplify things a bit. > ... >> --- a/include/asm-ppc/fsl_pci.h >> +++ b/include/asm-ppc/fsl_pci.h >> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ >> #define __FSL_PCI_H_ >> >> int fsl_pci_setup_inbound_windows(struct pci_region *r); >> -void fsl_pci_init(struct pci_controller *hose); >> +void fsl_pci_init(struct pci_controller *hose, u32 cfg_addr, u32 >> cfg_data); > > There will never be any system where 64 bit addresses may be needed?
I thought about this, pci_setup_indirect() takes u32's at this time. I'm not sure what the best option is here. - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
