On Friday, November 06, 2015 at 09:11:20 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: [...]
> >> all these are spi-nor controller which doesn't do any generic spi > >> things but should be in spi-nor subsystem. Even Marek send altera_qspi > >> as spi-nor controller [1] > > > > This is because that thing communicates like a SPI controller. > > OK, the driver you sent to Linux is not same as this - means not same > controller? This is correct, the controller we're discussing here is completely different from the Cadence QSPI I submitted for Linux kernel. > >> Since I'm working on similar spi-nor subsystem what Linux have + > >> driver model little worried about this because once we have spi-nor > >> again it should be a re-work. > > > > Your work and this driver are orthogonal things. > > OK, let's park my work a side - do you agree with me like this driver > should be part of spi-nor? No Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
