Hi Stephen, On 21 October 2015 at 10:31, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > > On 10/03/2015 08:30 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> On 3 October 2015 at 00:44, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: >>> >>> From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> >>> >>> PCI addresses are always represented as 3 cells in DT. (one cell for bus >>> and device, and two cells for a 64-bit addres). This does not vary based >>> on either the physical address size of the CPU, nor any #address-cells >>> property in DT (or more precisely, #address-cells must be set to 3 in any >>> PCIe controller's node). >>> >>> Fix fdtdec_get_pci_addr() to use conversion functions that operate on >>> (fixed) cell-sized data rather than (varying) physical-address-sized >>> data, so that the function works on 64-bit systems. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> >>> --- >>> lib/fdtdec.c | 14 +++++++------- >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> >> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > > Simon, this patch appears to be assigned to you in patchwork. Will you apply > it now the merge window is open, or are you assuming it will go through the > Tegra tree with all the PCIe patches? >
I can pick it up. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
