Hi Stephen,

On 21 October 2015 at 10:31, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
>
> On 10/03/2015 08:30 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> On 3 October 2015 at 00:44, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
>>>
>>> PCI addresses are always represented as 3 cells in DT. (one cell for bus
>>> and device, and two cells for a 64-bit addres). This does not vary based
>>> on either the physical address size of the CPU, nor any #address-cells
>>> property in DT (or more precisely, #address-cells must be set to 3 in any
>>> PCIe controller's node).
>>>
>>> Fix fdtdec_get_pci_addr() to use conversion functions that operate on
>>> (fixed) cell-sized data rather than (varying) physical-address-sized
>>> data, so that the function works on 64-bit systems.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
>>> ---
>>>   lib/fdtdec.c | 14 +++++++-------
>>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
>
>
> Simon, this patch appears to be assigned to you in patchwork. Will you apply 
> it now the merge window is open, or are you assuming it will go through the 
> Tegra tree with all the PCIe patches?
>

I can pick it up.

Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to