Hi Suriyan, On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Suriyan Bhavani <suriyanandbhav...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gary, > Recently you submitted a patch to fix the ext4 symlnik issue. > > Can you please tell me the actual commands that failed or gave wrong > results?
The load command (tested on ext4 partition) was failing with an error that said the file didn't exist since ext4fs_read_file was returning 0 (success) but this return value was considered a failure. > I ask cause I am trying to do the below: > 1. Incorporate symlnk test in fs-test.sh > 2. use host instead of sb as sb is deprecated > 3. Reproduce the issue without your fix, so I can see what is failing > > I haven't been able to do 3. above (by reverting your fix to recreate the > error conditions). I tried the below commands in sandbox and they worked as > expected. (by creating a soft link pointing to 1MB.file) Have you reverted my patch only or did you go back to a prior commit of 9f12cd0 which is where the API changed? > # generic command check > > ls host 0:0 > > size host 0:0 1MB.file.link > > load host 0:0 0x01000008 1MB.file.link > > md5sum 0x01000008 $filesize > > > # ext command check > > ext4size host 0:0 1MB.file.link > > ext4load host 0:0 0x01000008 1MB.file.link > > md5sum 0x01000008 $filesize That sounds about right, that is the kind of test I wanted to add. Could you share the output of the ls command on the link file? > Would be nice to throw some light on this issue so I can build a test case. Well I hope my answer will help. I wanted to update the test script but the sandbox didn't seem to work (I've sent an email about it). Regards, Gary _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
