On Wednesday, September 23, 2015 at 12:30:34 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > On 23 September 2015 at 15:43, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 23, 2015 at 12:11:20 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > >> On 11 September 2015 at 23:58, Vikas Manocha <vikas.mano...@st.com> wrote: > >> > Indirect read/write start addresses are flash start addresses for > >> > indirect read or write transfers. These should be absolute flash > >> > addresses instead of offsets. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Vikas Manocha <vikas.mano...@st.com> > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jt...@openedev.com> > >> > >> > --- > >> > > >> > Changes in v6: none > >> > Changes in v5: fixed type cast compilation warnings. > >> > Changes in v4: removed extra type casts. > >> > Changes in v3: none > >> > Changes in v2: Rebased to master > >> > > >> > drivers/spi/cadence_qspi_apb.c | 6 ++++-- > >> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/cadence_qspi_apb.c > >> > b/drivers/spi/cadence_qspi_apb.c index d377ad1..c5b14c5 100644 > >> > --- a/drivers/spi/cadence_qspi_apb.c > >> > +++ b/drivers/spi/cadence_qspi_apb.c > >> > @@ -705,7 +705,8 @@ int cadence_qspi_apb_indirect_read_setup(struct > >> > cadence_spi_platdata *plat, > >> > > >> > /* Get address */ > >> > addr_value = cadence_qspi_apb_cmd2addr(&cmdbuf[1], > >> > addr_bytes); > >> > > >> > - writel(addr_value, plat->regbase + > >> > CQSPI_REG_INDIRECTRDSTARTADDR); + writel((u32)plat->ahbbase + > >> > addr_value, > >> > + plat->regbase + CQSPI_REG_INDIRECTRDSTARTADDR); > >> > > >> > /* The remaining lenght is dummy bytes. */ > >> > dummy_bytes = cmdlen - addr_bytes - 1; > >> > > >> > @@ -795,7 +796,8 @@ int cadence_qspi_apb_indirect_write_setup(struct > >> > cadence_spi_platdata *plat, > >> > > >> > /* Setup write address. */ > >> > reg = cadence_qspi_apb_cmd2addr(&cmdbuf[1], addr_bytes); > >> > > >> > - writel(reg, plat->regbase + CQSPI_REG_INDIRECTWRSTARTADDR); > >> > + writel((u32)plat->ahbbase + reg, > > > > Jagan, is introducing ad-hoc typecasts to suppress warnings OK with you ? > > I think there are few ad-hoc typecasts similar to were there in the > driver, do you have any other thoughts?
Yes, for example -- fix the few, then add new features. Adding more just because there were some before is a totally shitty approach. Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot