Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 22:24 Wed 22 Jul , Ben Warren wrote: > >> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> >>>>> -SRCS := $(SOBJS:.o=.S) $(COBJS:.o=.c) >>>>> -OBJS := $(addprefix $(obj),$(SOBJS) $(COBJS)) >>>>> +SRCS := $(SOBJS:.o=.S) $(COBJS:.o=.c) $(COBJS-y:.o=.c) >>>>> +OBJS := $(addprefix $(obj),$(SOBJS) $(COBJS) $(COBJS-y)) >>>>> all: $(obj).depend $(LIB) >>>>> diff --git a/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ks8721.c >>>>> b/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ks8721.c >>>>> new file mode 100644 >>>>> index 0000000..703e58c >>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>> +++ b/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ks8721.c >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,244 @@ >>>>> +/* >>>>> + * (C) Copyright 2006 >>>>> + * Author : Eric Benard (Eukrea Electromatique) >>>>> + * based on dm9161.c which is : >>>>> + * (C) Copyright 2003 >>>>> + * Author : Hamid Ikdoumi (Atmel) >>>>> >>>> I'm not a fan of this implementation at all >>>> >>>> but as I've not yet finish the rm9200 cleanup >>>> I'll ack this ben what do you think? >>>> ben please note that the rm9200 cleanup will introduce a phylib support >>>> >>> Ben ping >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> J. >>> >> This patch has many coding style violations that haven't been >> addressed, so it can't go in. I"m not a fan of the piece-meal PHY >> implementation either, but realize that a real PHY lib isn't >> imminent, unless your rm2000 implementation is useful across >> architectures. >> > it will be a generic implementation > as we need it also for other soc and arch for our boards. > > Best Regards, > J. > Good. Can't wait.
Ben _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
