Hi,
On 14-09-15 13:42, Hans de Goede wrote:
Supporting both boot.scr and uEnv.txt for FEL boot seems to be
reasonably simple to me. You can even do it in a single patch
series. As Hans suggests, please take care of the boot.scr case
first. Then maybe introduce uEnv.txt support with an additional
patch.
I'm still not convinced that support uEnv.txt is necessary at all,
but I agree that if we this having this done through extra fields,
rather then through a union would be better.
p.s.
As for the version byte vs minor/major scheme discussion. Why not
simply declare that we will always be backwards compatible, and
only ever add new fields ? Then we can simply add version checks
around those new fields, and have both back and forward compatibility.
In this case the single byte should suffice nicely.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
