Hi Lars, On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Lars, > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Joe Hershberger > <joe.hershber...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Lars, >> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Lars Poeschel <poesc...@lemonage.de> wrote: >>> Hi Joe, >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:03:59AM -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote: >>>> >> I beat you to it: >>>> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-May/214261.html >>>> > >>>> > Well, ... ok. You won ;-) Your patchset is by far more comprehensive than >>>> > mine. >>>> > If I see this right in the archives, you did not receive any comments >>>> > since nearly a month. >>>> >>>> That is true. I really would like a little feedback on it... or maybe >>>> I can just drop the controversial one and only include these things... >>>> they seem to be mostly straightforward. >>>> >>>> > This was RFC will you resend this as a "real" PATCH ? >>>> >>>> Yes. >>>> >>>> > Could you then include two of the dependencies from my patches: >>>> > I think CMD_UBI has to depend on MTD_PARTITIONS and obivously CMD_UBIFS
I noticed when adding MTD_PARTITIONS that MTD_DEVICE is not moved over yet. Do you know what the dependency relationship is there? If not I'll dig into it a bit. >>>> > has to depend on CMD_UBI. >>>> >>>> Will do. >>> >>> I saw no action from you on this one. Can I help out - at least for the >>> decompression / ubi / ubifs part ? >> >> Sorry about that... the end of last release got a little crazy. >> >>> I think the setexpr / env location parts from your patchset can then go >>> in as seperate patches. >> >> I agree. I'll split them apart and send these out. > > I haven't forgotten about this... I plan to get this sent out this week. I had this ready to go, but conflicts with https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/508134/, so I'm gonna have to regenerate the moves after that goes in. -Joe _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
