Hi Fabio, On 02/08/2015 17:48, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> wrote: > >> I have a main question. For i.MX6, we could factorize (mainly thanks >> Tim's work) the major SOC variants, getting some important goals, as >> having a single u-boot image running on different variations of the same >> board. >> >> This was reached deciding at run time which is the pin, its register and >> the value to be written - instead of fixing at build time. >> >> Exceptions are the SOC that cannot be substitute by another one on the >> same board, because they are not pin compatible: for example, MX&SX. >> >> Now you are introducing the new architecture for MX7, but it looks like >> you get rid of these improvements. It can be right or false, then my >> questions: >> >> - has MX7 quite the same variations as MX6 ? I mean a qaud, dual and >> solo that are pin-to-pin compatible ? > > No, mx7 is not pin compatible with the mx6 family. >
Thanks, got it. Regards, Stefano -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sba...@denx.de ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
