Hi, Tom
On 6/8/2015 9:20 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 10:26:29AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Monday, June 08, 2015 at 04:05:04 AM, Josh Wu wrote:
Hi, Marek
On 6/5/2015 9:18 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday, June 05, 2015 at 09:47:30 AM, Josh Wu wrote:
Since some driver like ohci, lcd used dcache functions. But some ARM
cpu don't implement the invalidate_dcache_range()/flush_dcache_range()
functions.
To avoid compiling errors this patch adds an weak empty stub function
for all ARM cpu.
And each cpu can implement its own implementation. If not implemented
by default it will use an empty function.
Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh...@atmel.com>
---
Changes in v2: new added
arch/arm/lib/cache.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
So, why exactly can't this be entirely common code , but a CPU-specific
code ? :)
Do you mean to make those empty functions as common code for all arch
cpu to use?
Yes.
It seems there is no place to put common code for all arch cpu.
Isn't that what the common/ directory is for ? ;-)
No, this is making something common for the sake of making it common
rather than good architecutre of the code I think. We aren't going to
share real cache functions just these dummy ones.
So it is the right place: arch/arm/lib/cache.c to put the dummy cache
function.
We may re-evaluate
our dummy ones at some point in the future when people try and use some
particular combination harder, see for example the PowerPC dummy cache
functions we just recently dropped. Thanks!
If this patch set are ok for you. I will sent more patches to drop the
dummy cache functions in <arch>/cpu/ folders.
Also the flush_cache() in arch/arm/lib/cache.c can be dropped and just
call flush_dcache_range() as the ARM1136, ARM926ejs alreay implemented
their own flush_cache().
Best Regards,
Josh Wu
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
