Hi, On 21 May 2015 at 15:13, Matthew Starr <mst...@hedonline.com> wrote: > Simon, > >> On 21 May 2015 at 15:02, Matthew Starr <mst...@hedonline.com> wrote: >> > >> > CONFIG_MXC_USB_PORT was used to define which USB port was to be >> > initialized. If CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT > 1, then the port >> > specified by CONFIG_MXC_USB_PORT would be duplicated >> > CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT times including duplicating all >> > devices connected to the ports. None of the other USB ports would be >> > available for use. >> > >> > The fix is to remove all instances of CONFIG_MXC_USB_PORT from the >> > imx53 ehci driver since it was only allowing the port specified by >> > CONFIG_MXC_USB_PORT to be populated. Then use >> > CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to specifiy which USB ports >> should be >> > enabled, starting with port 0. If port 1 is needed, then set >> > CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to 2 so 2 ports get populated >> (port 0 >> > and port 1) even though port 0 will not be used. >> > >> > Configurations for all boards affected are updated. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Starr <mst...@hedonline.com> >> > >> > --- >> > >> > drivers/usb/host/ehci-mx5.c | 8 ++++---- >> > include/configs/m53evk.h | 2 +- >> > include/configs/mx51_efikamx.h | 1 + >> > include/configs/mx51evk.h | 2 +- >> > include/configs/mx53loco.h | 2 +- >> > include/configs/usbarmory.h | 2 +- >> > 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> Perhaps instead this should move to driver model - it supports EHCI. >> See tegra, exynos, sunxi and sandbox. > > Wouldn't that require imx53 support for device trees? Currently I don't > believe that is implemented yet.
Yes, although it's pretty simple. Add CONFIG_OF_CONTROL and CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE, copy the files in from the kernel and all should be well. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
