Simon, > On 21 May 2015 at 15:02, Matthew Starr <mst...@hedonline.com> wrote: > > > > CONFIG_MXC_USB_PORT was used to define which USB port was to be > > initialized. If CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT > 1, then the port > > specified by CONFIG_MXC_USB_PORT would be duplicated > > CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT times including duplicating all > > devices connected to the ports. None of the other USB ports would be > > available for use. > > > > The fix is to remove all instances of CONFIG_MXC_USB_PORT from the > > imx53 ehci driver since it was only allowing the port specified by > > CONFIG_MXC_USB_PORT to be populated. Then use > > CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to specifiy which USB ports > should be > > enabled, starting with port 0. If port 1 is needed, then set > > CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT to 2 so 2 ports get populated > (port 0 > > and port 1) even though port 0 will not be used. > > > > Configurations for all boards affected are updated. > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Starr <mst...@hedonline.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/usb/host/ehci-mx5.c | 8 ++++---- > > include/configs/m53evk.h | 2 +- > > include/configs/mx51_efikamx.h | 1 + > > include/configs/mx51evk.h | 2 +- > > include/configs/mx53loco.h | 2 +- > > include/configs/usbarmory.h | 2 +- > > 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > Perhaps instead this should move to driver model - it supports EHCI. > See tegra, exynos, sunxi and sandbox.
Wouldn't that require imx53 support for device trees? Currently I don't believe that is implemented yet. Regards, Matthew _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
