Hi Joe,
On 21 April 2015 at 10:05, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
> > Hi Joe,
> >
> > On 20 April 2015 at 23:24, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> Hi Simon,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
> >>> This adds a simple test for probing and a functional test using the flash
> >>> stick emulator, which tests a large chunk of the USB stack.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
> >>
> >> I'm seeing a seg fault when running the dm tests and bisected it to this
> >> patch.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure why it's related, but it appears to seg fault on a GPIO
> >> test...
>
> <--snip-->
>
> >> Thoughts?
> >
> > Yes it is broken. I sent a series to fix this recent ('dm: core: Fix
> > up test failures') starting with this patch:
> >
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/462556/
> >
> > If you are able to test it that would be good.
>
> I tested the series, but I still have a USB test failure...
>
> """
> Test: dm_test_usb_flash
> USB-1: scanning bus 1 for devices... 2 USB Device(s) found
> /home/joe/u-boot/test/dm/usb.c:45, dm_test_usb_flash(): 2 ==
> dev_desc->block_read(dev_desc->dev, 0, 2, cmp): Expected 2, got 0
> """
>
> Have you seen that one?
No I don't see that. It is saying that it was not able to read 2
512-byte blocks from the testflash.bin file. It should be created by
the test script. I just tried it again.
BTW I'd like to get a sandbox network device that works in a purely
emulated way (i.e. without any reference to real hardware). Then we
could use it for ping tests, etc. and they would run instantly. At
present the network tests are quite slow. What do you think?
Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
