On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 14:44 -0700, York Sun wrote: > > On 03/20/2015 02:33 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 14:23 -0700, York Sun wrote: > >> > >> On 03/20/2015 02:15 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > >>> On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 12:21 -0700, York Sun wrote: > >>>> From: Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> > >>>> > >>>> This adds NAND boot support for LS2085AQDS, using SPL framework. > >>>> > >>>> To form a NAND image, append u-boot-with-spl.bin after a proper > >>>> nand boot RCW and flash to the beginning of NAND. > >>> > >>> Do we want to do it this way, or should we keep the RCW in a separate > >>> block? > >> > >> I would like to see RCW in a separated block. > > > > OK. In that case the offsets in this patch will need to change. > > > >>> What constitutes a "proper nand boot RCW" (those were not my words)? > >>> There are details in this patch regarding offsets that need to match > >>> details in the PBI (which is more than just RCW). > >> > >> It is not your original words. Yours was "To form a NAND image, append > >> u-boot-with-spl.bin after PBL_0x3_0x07_1333_nand.bin and flash to the > >> beginning > >> of NAND.". I try to make the message generic. A proper nand boot RCW means > >> the > >> RCW should contains PBI commands to set bootloc and block copy the image. > >> Since > >> RCW is not in the scope of u-boot, I cannot refer to any specific file. > > > > Yes, I know you can't refer to the file, but it needs to be made clear > > what the expectations of that PBI file are. > > I think a proper solution would be to put detail instruction into board README > file by adding > > To form the NAND image, append u-boot-with-spl.bin after RCW image. The RCW > image should have these PBI commands > > CCSR 4-byte write to 0x00e00404, data=0x00000000 > CCSR 4-byte write to 0x00e00400, data=0x1800a000 > Block Copy: SRC=0x0104, SRC_ADDR=0x000000c0, DEST_ADDR=0x1800a000, > BLOCK_SIZE=0x00014000 > > We need to revise the SRS_ADDR if moving u-boot to a separated block. Please > advise what address is appropriate.
It should be equal to the NAND block size (not to be confused with PBI block copy size). > Please also advise the BLOCK_SIZE. Does it need to be fixed, or min(0x14000, > sizeof(u-boot-spl.bin))? It should be fixed because we don't want it to have to be updated every time the SPL build changes. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
