Hi Matt,

> On Feb 23, 2015, at 23:52 , Matt Reimer <mrei...@sdgsystems.com> wrote:
> 
> Properly mask SELBASECLK by using an actual mask rather than the
> number of bits to shift in order to create the mask.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Reimer <mrei...@sdgsystems.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c |    2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c
> index 3899372..0eec731 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static void s5p_sdhci_set_control_reg(struct sdhci_host 
> *host)
>       sdhci_writel(host, SDHCI_CTRL4_DRIVE_MASK(0x3), SDHCI_CONTROL4);
> 
>       val = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_CONTROL2);
> -     val &= SDHCI_CTRL2_SELBASECLK_SHIFT;
> +     val &= SDHCI_CTRL2_SELBASECLK_MASK(3);
> 
>       val |=  SDHCI_CTRL2_ENSTAASYNCCLR |
>               SDHCI_CTRL2_ENCMDCNFMSK |
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 

Thanks, applied.

— Pantelis

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to