Hi, Matt. You're right, it's wrong masking.
Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.ch...@samsung.com> Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung On 02/24/2015 06:52 AM, Matt Reimer wrote: > Properly mask SELBASECLK by using an actual mask rather than the > number of bits to shift in order to create the mask. > > Signed-off-by: Matt Reimer <mrei...@sdgsystems.com> > --- > drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c > index 3899372..0eec731 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/s5p_sdhci.c > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static void s5p_sdhci_set_control_reg(struct sdhci_host > *host) > sdhci_writel(host, SDHCI_CTRL4_DRIVE_MASK(0x3), SDHCI_CONTROL4); > > val = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_CONTROL2); > - val &= SDHCI_CTRL2_SELBASECLK_SHIFT; > + val &= SDHCI_CTRL2_SELBASECLK_MASK(3); > > val |= SDHCI_CTRL2_ENSTAASYNCCLR | > SDHCI_CTRL2_ENCMDCNFMSK | > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
