On 3/4/15 7:21 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Monday, March 02, 2015 at 05:28:05 PM, dingu...@opensource.altera.com 
> wrote:
>> From: Dinh Nguyen <dingu...@opensource.altera.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dingu...@opensource.altera.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/socfpga/spl.c | 8 ++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/socfpga/spl.c
>> b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/socfpga/spl.c index ea4a1fb..31ac789 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/socfpga/spl.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/socfpga/spl.c
>> @@ -191,4 +191,12 @@ void spl_board_init(void)
>>
>>      sdram_size = sdram_calculate_size();
>>      debug("SDRAM: %ld MiB\n", (sdram_size >> 20));
>> +
>> +    /* Sanity check ensure correct SDRAM size specified */
>> +    puts("SDRAM: Ensuring specified SDRAM size is correct ...");
>> +    if (get_ram_size(0, sdram_size) != sdram_size) {
>> +            puts("failed\n");
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Maybe just report a failure, the positive state is not interesting
> to the user and just polutes the console with messages which noone
> cares about (unless this would be a debug build maybe).
> 
> What do you think please ?
> 

Yeah, I think that's fine.

Dinh
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to