On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Paul Kocialkowski <cont...@paulk.fr> wrote: > Le lundi 23 février 2015 à 16:43 -0600, Nishanth Menon a écrit : >> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 08:16:44PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: >> > >> >> Not every version and revision of the Cortex-A8 ARM core requires the same >> >> errata workarounds. In addition, enabling those requires to have similar >> >> workarounds enabled in the kernel or it will cause numerous segmentation >> >> faults. >> >> >> >> This enables those workarounds when they are needed, according to what is >> >> done >> >> in Linux. >> >> >> >> Follow-up to the discussion from July 2013: >> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2013-July/158377.html >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <cont...@paulk.fr> >> > >> > Nishanth, any comments here, since you've been thinking about errata >> > stuff lately? Thanks! >> > >> > Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> >> > >> >> I would probably go with v7 start code triggering the logic. even >> though the secure logic is probably unique.. > > It does seem like the secure logic is specific to the OMAP, even though > the GP part (omap3_gp_romcode_call) seems to be generic. > > I don't think it would fit well in common v7 code and overall, I don't > think I have sufficient knowledge of those issues to take the decision > to move that code around. > > Hence, I'll keep my proposal to what it is now, and let someone else > move the code around in the future if they feel the need to.
Do you mind if i took a shot at it? would be great if you could test the same. -- --- Regards, Nishanth Menon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
