Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> no as you add the nand in this patch
> the nand need to be add in a seperate patch,
> this one need to only add the s3c2440 support
> and the nand will be handle by Scott the nand Maintainer

If a NAND patch is sandwiched in the middle of other patches that need 
to go via an arch tree, and depends on some of those patches, I'd rather 
ack the NAND bits to go through the arch tree rather than try to merge 
everything separately while still maintaining dependencies.  In that 
case, keeping the NAND bits in a separate patch is nice, but not 
mandatory IMHO.

I'll look at that patch soon.

-Scott
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to