Personally not interested. I don't want to license my code under GPLv3 g.
On Jun 18, 2009 8:51 AM, "Wolfgang Denk" <w...@denx.de> wrote: Hello, I was asked about relicensing U-Boot as GPLv3: ------- Forwarded Message Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:17:28 -0400 From: Richard Stallman <r...@gnu.org> To: Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> Subject: U-book and GPLv3? I really enjoy the name U-boot. What are the advantages of U-boot over PMON? Have you considered moving U-boot to "GPLv3-or-later"? ------- End of Forwarded Message I know that we have had similar discussions before (see for example http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/24029), but I would like to take the chance and re-poll what the community's opinion about this is. Comments welcome... [I intend to summarize and send this summary to RMS and post it here.] Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de I have often regretted my speech, never my silence. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
