On 18 December 2014 at 18:38, Ben Dooks <ben.do...@codethink.co.uk> wrote:
> On 18/12/14 12:14, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On 17 November 2014 at 20:21, Ben Dooks <ben.do...@codethink.co.uk> wrote:
>>> From: Adnan Ali <adnan....@codethink.co.uk>
>>>
>>> Add S25FL064A and S25FL116K flash indentifiers.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Adnan Ali <adnan....@codethink.co.uk>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
>>> index 61545ca..462e5c2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
>>> @@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ const struct spi_flash_params spi_flash_params_table[] = {
>>> {"S25FL016A", 0x010214, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 32, 0,
>>> 0},
>>> {"S25FL032A", 0x010215, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0,
>>> 0},
>>> {"S25FL064A", 0x010216, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0,
>>> 0},
>>> + {"S25FL064A", 0x010216, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0,
>>> 0},
>>
>> What is this, already there the same part - any new?
>
> I must have missed this when re-basing off the previous u-boot.
>
>>> + {"S25FL116k", 0x014015, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0,
>>> 0},
>>
>> Is this tested! can you rebase master and send the same patches.
>
> Yes, it was one of the devices we looked at and tested on a Marvell
> 88F6281 based system.
>
>>> {"S25FL128P_256K", 0x012018, 0x0300, 256 * 1024, 64, RD_FULL,
>>> WR_QPP},
>>> {"S25FL128P_64K", 0x012018, 0x0301, 64 * 1024, 256, RD_FULL,
>>> WR_QPP},
>>> {"S25FL032P", 0x010215, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 64, RD_FULL,
>>> WR_QPP},
>>> --
>>> 2.1.1
>>>
Applied to u-boot-spi/master
thanks!
--
Jagan.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
