Hi all,
this patch fixes a bug for 'nand erase' command: when bad blocks are
present into erasing area, they were skipped but the erased size was
updated anyway.
Regards,
Michele Jr De Candia
Signed-off-by: Michele Jr De Candia <michele.decan...@valueteam.com>
diff -Naur u-boot-trunk-orig/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c u-boot-trunk/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c
--- u-boot-trunk-orig/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c 2009-06-15 11:16:04.000000000 +0200
+++ u-boot-trunk/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c 2009-06-16 14:42:21.000000000 +0200
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
{
struct jffs2_unknown_node cleanmarker;
erase_info_t erase;
- ulong erase_length;
+ ulong erase_length, erased_length;
int bbtest = 1;
int result;
int percent_complete = -1;
@@ -119,8 +119,9 @@
erase_length = meminfo->erasesize;
}
+ erased_length = 0;
for (;
- erase.addr < opts->offset + erase_length;
+ erased_length < erase_length;
erase.addr += meminfo->erasesize) {
WATCHDOG_RESET ();
@@ -149,6 +150,8 @@
mtd_device, result);
continue;
}
+ else
+ erased_length += erase.len;
/* format for JFFS2 ? */
if (opts->jffs2 && chip->ecc.layout->oobavail >= 8) {
@@ -169,9 +172,7 @@
}
if (!opts->quiet) {
- unsigned long long n =(unsigned long long)
- (erase.addr + meminfo->erasesize - opts->offset)
- * 100;
+ unsigned long long n = erased_length * 100;
int percent;
do_div(n, erase_length);
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
