Hi Heiko, On 8 December 2014 at 23:17, Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> wrote: > Hello Simon, > > Am 09.12.2014 06:31, schrieb Simon Glass: > >> Hi, >> >> On Dec 5, 2014 8:32 AM, "Simon Glass" <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> The uclass implements the same operations as the current I2C framework >>> but >>> makes some changes to make it fit driver model better: >>> >>> - Remove the chip address from API calls >>> - Remove the address length from API calls >>> - Remove concept of 'current' I2C bus >>> - Drop all existing init functions >>> >>> Acked-by: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> >>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> >>> --- >>> >>> Changes in v5: >>> - Add a function comment for i2c_probe_chip() >>> - Add an assert for offset_len in i2c_setup_offset() >>> - Add more detail to return value comment on get_buf_speed() >>> - Add more detail to return value comment on xfer() method >>> - Fix -INVAL typo >>> - Make i2c_get_bus_speed() independent of i2c_set_bus_speed() >>> - Split DM_I2C_CHIP_RD_ADDRESS into read and write varaints >>> - Update comments in struct i2c_msg to allow buf to be NULL >>> - Use a NULL buffer in i2c_probe_chip() >> >> >> Any. Ore comments please? Otherwise I will retest and apply this version. > > > I am fine with it. Thanks for your and Masahiros work! > > I hope I find some time to look into using platform data, as I have > no board which uses DT support in U-Boot ...
What platform do you use? Stefan gave me a Glacier board and I have that running with DT and driver model. Will send some patches before long. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
