On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 13:45 +0900, Hyungwon Hwang wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 15:33:05 +0100 > Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.sim...@collabora.co.uk> wrote:
> > signed_bl1_position=1 > > bl2_position=31 > > uboot_position=63 > > tzsw_position=719 > > env_position=1231 > > > > for the various locations.. Which also explains the limit 335872 bytes > > in your initial mail.. Awkward one though. Wonder if that's an SoC > > issue or something hardkernel could fix by having a different bl1/bl2? > > > > (719 - 63) * 512 = 335876 bytes. The limitation is needed not to > overwrite tzsw. > > Are you saying that the limitation can be removed? Yes, with different > bl1/bl2. But I do not think that another bl1/bl2 will be released to > relieve the limitation. It was a something i was wondering. After send this e-mail i had a chat with Mauro Ribeiro on #linux-exynos. He indicate that the BL2 determines the u-boot load location and that it's an u-boot SPL build from their u-boot branch. Also he indicated that he would be happy to sign a modified SPL build which e.g. loads u-boot from behind the TZSW. You can find the IRC log here: http://irclog.whitequark.org/linux-exynos/2014-11-27 I have yet to take him up on that offer though, but it sounds like a good way forward. The current layout really isn't practical. -- Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.sim...@collabora.co.uk> Collabora Ltd.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
