Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> Kim Phillips wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:50:25 -0700
>> Ira Snyder <i...@ovro.caltech.edu> wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>>
>>> In practice, this doesn't seem to make a difference on the MPC8349EMDS
>>> eval board. Both settings work without any errors. For people like me,
>>> who are copying an existing board port to a similar board, it would be
>>> nice if it was correct.
>>
>> granted. I'm betting the sbc8349 and tqm834x just copied the setting
>
> You would be correct (at least for the sbc).
>
>> from the MDS code, so those should get 0 too. Board maintainers,
>> please test:
>
> I won't be able to test this on an sbc until later this week,
> but don't let that stop you from queueing it up; I suspect it
> will just be a formality.
I applied the chunk below onto a checkout of v2009.06-rc2 and it
works fine on sbc8349; tested both TSEC and at both 100 and 1GB.
Tested-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com>
-------
U-Boot 2009.06-rc2-dirty (Jun 05 2009 - 14:11:18) MPC83XX
Reset Status: Software Hard, External/Internal Soft, External/Internal Hard
CPU: e300c1, MPC8349E, Rev: 1.1 at 396 MHz, CSB: 264 MHz
Board: Wind River SBC834x
I2C: ready
DRAM: SDRAM on Local Bus: Disabled in config
256 MB (DDR1, 64-bit, ECC off, 264 MHz)
FLASH: 8 MB
In: serial
Out: serial
Err: serial
Net: TSEC0, TSEC1
=>
-------
>
> Thanks,
> Paul.
>
>
>> diff --git a/include/configs/sbc8349.h b/include/configs/sbc8349.h
>> index d0338f1..edd928d 100644
>> --- a/include/configs/sbc8349.h
>> +++ b/include/configs/sbc8349.h
>> @@ -519,7 +519,7 @@
>> #endif
>>
>> /* System IO Config */
>> -#define CONFIG_SYS_SICRH SICRH_TSOBI1
>> +#define CONFIG_SYS_SICRH 0
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_SICRL SICRL_LDP_A
>>
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_HID0_INIT 0x000000000
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Kim
>
>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
